|
|
MI6 talks to author Seb Harvey about his latest work
- controversial "The Final Assignment" novelisation.
|
|
The Final Assignment - Author Interview
5th August 2004
Keeping
The British End Up forum regular, Moore, interviewed author
Seb Harvey on the novelisation of "The
Final Assignment" for MI6 this week, and this is what
he had to ask…
Can you give us a bit of information on the origins of "The
Final Assignment"?
The Final Assignment novelisation is based upon a screenplay
with a similar sounding title. It was written – as I gather
– in late 1999. It later appeared on one of the leading
Bond20 news websites, dubbed as the official screenplay for the
twentieth film. Final Assignment as it were called, generated
huge world wide media attention, with thousands of people tuning
in to get a piece of the next film. Unfortunately, as soon as
shooting for the actual film began, people started to realise
that the screenplay there were reading was nothing like the official
announcements. Soon after, the script was forgotten and replaced
in the media with the official articles.
Why write "The Final Assignment"?
After writing two original fan fictions, I thought it would
be rather interesting to look at other work. Novelisations
were what came to mind. The Final Assignment screenplay,
despite is being the result of fan writing, is a very well
written and thought out story. And as far as I'm aware,
there isn’t a website out there with the whole screenplay
published. What I did, was take as much as the screenplay
as I could find, and create a completed work for it, in
dedication for the author. Let's be honest, it will never
make the studio and it is really a shame to leave it until
everyone has forgotten.
In the novel you refer to 007 in many different ways,
At times you call him "Bond" and others "Double-O
Seven". Why is this?
I’ve got three or four ways of referring to him,
outside the standard ‘he’ clause. I use ‘Bond’
for the general references, ‘James’ for the
more personal parts – which plays a much larger role
in this novel compared to anything else I’ve written
and finally ‘Double-O Seven’ when he’s
doing the typical James Bond stunts - such as killing someone.
Referring to him by his number makes him less emotional
to the reader. And with this story, it’s a plot of
revenge, which makes it even more important for the reader
to understand if Bond is doing something for himself, or
for his country.
|
|
Above: Final cover artwork for "The Final Assignment"
novelisation. |
How important was it, to keep the script as authentic as
possible?
Very, yet I have to make changes to suit my writing style,
and correct any unseen problems with the original text. After
all, this work is in honour of the original author, so with that
in mind, it is very important to keep as much of the dialogue
and sequence of events in tune with what was first written. For
those reading this plot for the first time, you’ll still
be reading a very accurate portrayal of the original work.
How much research was needed for this novelisation?
Quite a lot in terms of piecing together the script. I was
unable to find a complete copy of the original text. I had various
scenes from a range of sources which I had to then splice together
to form as much of the original work as possible. A very interesting
task indeed. Notably, I had to research various locations and
settings from where parts of the scenes are set. Such as Mont
Blanc, finding out what the place is really like, where it is,
what the culture is like and so on. But the main focus of research
was on trying to find out who originally wrote the story and if
they could be contacted. Unfortunately, I was unable to find,
so I still have some outstanding questions. I’m hoping that
whoever was behind it comes forward in the near future and contacts
me.
In the story you reference not only current events such
as The War on Terror, but events such as Pearl Harbour. Why did
you decide to incorporate that into the story?
They are events in our lives, well the so-called War on Terror
anyway. Events which were obviously wrong and caused so much political
debate. It was just fitting with the nature of the story to mention
my personal opinions on the war, and how they stemmed from the
response of Pearl Harbour. People look back at the response in
World War II as an historic moment America joined Europe in the
fight against the Nazis. Yet more happened that people don’t
appreciate. In the American response to Japan, they assassinated
a senior Japanese figure, changing the way war is fought for the
worse. Look into it!
Cyber Terrorism plays a role in this story, now I understand
the author of the screenplay came up with the idea, how did you
feel about writing about it and was any research required?
This is the more humorous part of the screenplay. It was
really the second story in the plot. The main one involving an
emotional battle between Bond and his opponent. There were certain
not-so-subtle hints to various leading software organisations
which took the seriousness away. So there were some changes in
this area. Overall, cyber terrorism is happening and it is a threat.
The seriousness of such threats needs to be listened to. Everything
in the modern age is computer based, key information on a person
can easily be found on someone’s computer. The world really
needs to take a firm view on this problem. The Final Assignment
takes it to the extremes, but that’s an action fiction,
the problems in the real world are just as serious, in different
ways.
Above: The teaser poster artwork that got everyone talking
again about the controversial script. |
|
There is a scene in the novel where Bond is a lot
crueller than he is in the films, what prompted you to write
him like that?
This novel sees Bond pushed to an extreme, with past
history catching up with him. It all forms his build up
for the story climax. So if you think Bond is pretty cruel
at this stage of the story, wait until you read part II!
On the same token, it was an opportunity to explore a different
side to our beloved superhero, giving the reader something
fresh to read. It was certainly enjoyable to write. And
if we’re both thinking of the same scene, what’s
been published is toned down more than what was first written!
The story has quite a twist with Bond's past. He finds
out all he knew about his father was incorrect. Why is this?
All part of the original screenplay. In fact, it’s
the main story of the plot. But it goes to show a new aspect
we haven’t seen before. It’s all about pushing
Bond to the limits, and while he has all this on his mind,
he’s out there doing his job.
In the novel you have a reference to the novel "On
Her Majesty's Secret Service" and a reference to how
Ian Fleming chose James Bond as his characters name. Why
did you decided to include these in the story?
To link it in with the world around us. People will
be able to relate better to it, and understand its connections
with the saga.
|
In "The Final Assignment" you included a sex scene,
although sex is a common subject in the world of 007, do you believe
that authors sometimes cross the line?
Everyone can cross the line, depending on who is reading
it. What’s acceptable to one person may not be acceptable
to another. As the author, you have to make a decision where the
taste and decency boundaries lye and then work within those guidelines.
On the other hand, James Bond was originally written for adults,
so it’s important to bear that in mind. They’re not
children’s books. If you do decide to take the path where
detailed encounters make part of the plot, it’s always a
worthy challenge to write something depictive, inoffensive and
leave just enough for the readers imagination. I think The Final
Assignment meets all of those points, and still has a positive
effect on the reader.
Bond's death in this story is not quick, but prolonged.
Bond knows that it is coming and he can't do anything about it.
How did you feel about killing off Bond?
Is he dead? There's a Part II, so I’ll have to keep
you waiting to read the real answer to this. Although, putting
Bond in a position where he is incapable to respond goes to show
somewhat that the character is as human as everyone else. Hopefully
what you read is enjoyable and understandable. But in regards
to what you can expect to see, you will have to wait...
Part II?
Next month! When writing something as anticipated as this,
you aim to get it right and deliver in a fully professional manner.
With the interest in this building, I decided to delay it for
a few months to work and perfect what was written. But part II
is in the works, almost nearing completion, so you can expect
that towards the end of August without any delay. Again, this
was something which influenced the slight delays, getting Part
II ready so that you don’t leave a too bigger gap between
the two novels.
Thanks to Moore and Seb Harvey.
Related Articles
"The Final Assignment"
- Part 1